Posts Tagged ‘opinion’

Wireless Toyz CEO Joe Barbat Asks “Do Cell Phones Cause Cancer?”

Wireless Toyz CEO Joe Barbat offers his opinion based on information recently released by the World Health Organization regarding long-term cell phone usage…

Q&A: What is the best verizon wireless phone out right now …

by CosmoPolitician Question by aa a:What is the best phone for Verizon Wireless now? What is your opinion because I’m buying a new one. Best answer: Reply by…

Motorola spokeswoman: Droid Bionic will launch with Verizon …

In my opinion, “incorporating several enhancements” means they are changing phones . The one thing we learned from this interview is that they still plan on calling this future device the Droid Bionic. It is highly unlikely it will be …

Can you give me your opinion on which cell phone you would pick …

Can you give me your opinion on which cell phone you would pick? wireless keyboard 2000 bу osde8info. Qυеѕtіοח bу Heather, (:: Cаח уου give mе уουr opinion οח wһісһ cell phone уου wουƖԁ pick? I Ɩіkе tһеm both, a lot :)

Re: WHY ARE THERE NO GOOD ANDROID PHONES ON ATT?

I’m going to take a guess that you’re either a jack a$$ in real life or you have no clue about etiquite.

FCC: white space devices won’t require spectrum sensing modules

Phew. For a moment few years there , we thought any device set up to operate on these so-called white spaces — which have been vacated following the analog-to-digital TV transition — would be forced to use spectrum sensing modules in order to ensure that no TV station was operating in areas in which it wanted to. Based on the FCC’s Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, which was just published a few days back, it looks as if forthcoming white space devices will not be required to ping databases in order to make absolutely sure that it won’t interfere with TV stations. That’s the long and short of it, which is fantastic ( if not expected ) news for device makers and anyone who despises red tape, but Ars Technica has taken an in-depth look at why the Commission made such a call. Indeed, the FCC’s 2008 Order mandated that white space gadgets check in beforehand in order to “protect TV signals from interference.” Essentially, the call that nixed this addition was the fact that this security ring would inadvertently provide “many wireless microphones systems that go to unlicensed use” — things like wireless systems at churches, football games, concerts, etc. As with anything FCC -related, it’s a long and wordy explanation, but those interested in the finer details are just one click away from the nitty-gritty. FCC: white space devices won’t require spectrum sensing modules originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:17:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Rahul Sood sees an awesome, but distant future for webOS devices

Rahul Sood, founder of Voodoo PC and current innovation tzar at HP , has some good and some bad news for us. On the one hand, the way he sees webOS development from the inside of the HP Palm coupling makes Rahul believe that “everyone will want in once the presentation of hardware is in front of them,” but then on the other, far less happy hand, he urges us to abandon hope of seeing that happen soon. We can’t know for sure what his definition of “soon” might be, but it does suggest webOS 2.0 will likely be a pure software drop later this year , to be followed by HPalm finally unveiling the hot new gear sometime in 2011 . Although that’s basically what we were expecting anyway, we can’t help but wonder why it’s taking so long to churn out some new devices — it’s not like they’re being made out of unobtainium… or are they, Rahul? Update: Rahul has clarified his tweet in a blog post , assuring us that we’ll see an entire new portfolio of webOS devices — replete with new form factors — take shape over the next 12 months. That, he says, means neither tomorrow nor 364 days from now. HPalm’s unification challenges are many and the roadmap remains fluid. Rahul Sood sees an awesome, but distant future for webOS devices originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 14 Sep 2010 03:27:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Re: No Android Sideloading

redpoint73 wrote: wingrider01 wrote:   really then why do the sites that tell you how to hack the phone caution it also. That kind of blows your opinion that  “Carriers and manufacturers just want to scare you into thinking you will brick your phone just so you don’t mess with their bloatware and proprietary ROM”   As posted by ATT on the forum – do so if you wish, neither ATT nor the manufacturer will assist if something goes south for the winter. Yeah, really.  I hack my phones constantly, loading custom ROMs, you name it.  No problems at all.  You obviously are too scared to ever do anything with your phone, so you can’t say anything about it if you haven’t tried it.   Yes, there is a tiny risk.  But just like when a drug manufacturer has to tell you there are risks of side effects.  Are you going to be scared from taking any meds if the chance having a bad side effect is one in thousands or millions?  If that were the case, you would never take any meds ever in your whole life.  Sometimes the benefits greatly outweigh the risk.   For that matter, your risk of dying in a car accident are pretty significant.  Yet I’m sure you insist on getting behind the wheel every day.    Another thing you have to remember, is yes you will see people posting on other forums about bricking their phones.  But the thing to keep in mind is that people usually only post when they have problems.  People tend not to post something when they do it right and everything goes well.  So it makes issues seem far more common then they really are.  If you could really see the proportion of people who hack their phones successfully, you would see the risk of bricking your phone is much less than 1%.   And like I said before, people tend to say they bricked their phone, when they haven’t.   You see posts like this occassionally on XDA.  Some guys starts a thread “I think I bricked my phone”, and somebody else responds “no you didn’t, do this”.  Then the OP writes back “Oh thanks, that worked”.  Its not a brick if you can fix it that easily.  A friend just commented the other day “I almost bricked my iPhone”.  Umm, no you didn’t.  Either you bricked it or you didn’t.  You can’t “almost brick” a phone.    I don’t expect or need ATT or HTC to help me with my phone if I do brick it.  If I brick it, I’ll probably buy another one.  Its the risk I’m willing to take.  Not everybody is going to take that risk, and I understand that.  Even if you do brick your phone, ATT may replace it.  If they can’t power it on, they won’t know you bricked it, and just assume it a hardware problem.  I’ve seen people post to this effect either here or on XDA (sent a bricked phone in for warranty and had it replaced).  I’m not counting on it.  But it happens. What ever floats your boat – the caution is put there becasue there IS a chance of bricking a phone when you hack it, the legitimate sites that publish the instructions put the warning there to eliminate the liability and the chance of a user permently damaging their phone and persuing legal action via a crass action suit or the such, the script kiddie sites rarely have this since they are anonomous and do not require proof.   Just because you feel invincible, does not justify telling other people that there is no chance of inadverently damaging their property unless you are willing to be held responsible for the damage. Not everyone has the spare cash to dump on buying a new phone at full retail if they try something and break it.   As far as “to scared” don;t make assumptions, it just proves nothing, because 99 percent of the time you are wrong. I and my employees use the company supplied phones for business, any employee that attempt to hack a corporate supplied cell phone and is discovered on a random audit of the phone is fired on the spot, no appeal. They since a document stating that, and have fired a few people for compromising the phone. You unvalidated assumption in that series of statements point right at the age bracket you are in. 

AT&T handing out free 3G MicroCells to loyal customers?

While we’ve no clue how widespread AT&T’s generosity is, or how you might get one, it appears that the company’s “most valuable customers” are now receiving free range-boosting femtocells . Today, loyal reader Jason got a old-fashioned paper letter in the mail, offering his iPhone-wielding family a 3G MicroCell with no strings attached. Driving down to the local AT&T store, he got the product, but the dumbfounded reps offered no explanation why. Though his calls do frequently drop at home, Jason says he wasn’t terribly vocal about the issue and only pays around $180 per month for his family plan — the only thing that might possibly qualify him, in his opinion, is that his contract was set to expire. We’ve reached out to AT&T for more information; in the meanwhile, see Jason’s letter after the break. [Thanks, Jason] Continue reading AT&T handing out free 3G MicroCells to loyal customers? AT&T handing out free 3G MicroCells to loyal customers? originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:56:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Buy Cheap 3dB Mini Antenna For Alcatel | WIRELESS EXTENDERS CELL …

3dB Mini Antenna for Alcatel x200 DescriptionHigh quality antenna will lower your opinion of negative electromagnetic fields if acclimated properly with Alcatel.